Overview
A master architect doesn't just follow blueprints—they understand the structural principles that make buildings stable, functional, and beautiful. Similarly, AI agent architectures are not just code patterns but fundamental approaches to organizing perception, reasoning, and action that determine how intelligently an agent can behave.
In this lesson, we'll explore the key architectural patterns that have emerged in AI agents, from the elegant simplicity of ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) to sophisticated multi-layer systems that can handle complex, multi-step reasoning and planning.
Learning Objectives
After completing this lesson, you will be able to:
- Understand and implement the ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) pattern
- Design Plan-and-Execute architectures for complex tasks
- Compare different reasoning patterns and choose appropriate ones for specific use cases
- Implement reflection and self-correction mechanisms in agents
- Build agents that can decompose complex goals into manageable subtasks
The ReAct Architecture: Thinking and Acting in Harmony
The Power of Interleaving Thought and Action
Traditional approaches either think completely before acting (planning) or act without thinking (reactive). ReAct revolutionizes this by interleaving reasoning and acting—thinking a bit, acting a bit, observing the results, then thinking some more.
Analogy: Think of a skilled detective solving a case. They don't plan every step in advance, nor do they act randomly. Instead, they:
- Think: "Based on the evidence, the suspect might be at the coffee shop"
- Act: Go to the coffee shop and ask questions
- Observe: "The barista says they haven't seen the suspect, but mentions they often go to the library"
- Think: "Let me check the library next"
- Act: Head to the library...
This iterative process allows for adaptive problem-solving that pure planning or pure reaction cannot achieve.
Architecture Pattern Comparison
Reactive Pattern (Stimulus-Response):
Deliberative Pattern (Plan-Execute):
ReAct Pattern (Think-Act-Observe):
Hybrid Pattern (Multi-Layer):
Interactive ReAct Demonstration
Interactive Beam Search Tree
Initial Token Candidates
💡 Understanding This Visualization
Green boxes show the 3 best sequences kept at each step. These are the "beams" that continue to the next generation step.
Red boxes show candidate sequences that were generated but pruned because they had lower cumulative scores than the top 3.
Cumulative Score is the sum of log probabilities for all tokens in the sequence. Higher scores indicate more likely sequences according to the model.
Use the step controls to see how beam search explores multiple paths simultaneously and prunes less promising candidates at each step.
Implementing ReAct: The Basic Pattern
python# ReAct Agent Implementation class ReActAgent: def __init__(self, llm, tools): self.llm = llm self.tools = tools self.max_iterations = 10 def solve(self, task: str) -> str: """Main ReAct loop""" context = f"Task: {task}\n\n"
ReAct Pattern Variations
Variation | Key Feature | Best Use Case | Complexity |
---|---|---|---|
Basic ReAct | Simple reasoning-action cycles | Well-defined tasks | Low |
Chain-of-Thought ReAct | Extended reasoning steps | Complex problem solving | Medium |
Multi-step ReAct | Long action sequences | Multi-stage workflows | High |
Parallel ReAct | Concurrent reasoning paths | Time-sensitive decisions | Very High |
Enhanced ReAct Patterns:
- ReAct-SC (Self-Correction): Adds self-reflection steps where the agent evaluates its own reasoning and actions
- ReAct-Memory: Incorporates long-term memory to remember useful patterns from previous tasks
- Multi-Modal ReAct: Extends ReAct to handle images, audio, and other modalities beyond text
Plan-and-Execute: Deliberative Architecture
When You Need a Master Plan
Some tasks require comprehensive planning before execution—like organizing a conference or debugging a complex software system. Plan-and-Execute architectures first create a detailed plan, then execute it step by step.
Analogy: Building a house requires careful planning—you can't just start hammering and hope for the best. You need architectural drawings, permits, material lists, and a construction schedule before breaking ground.
Planning Process Visualization
Plan-and-Execute Implementation
python# Plan-and-Execute Agent class PlanAndExecuteAgent: def __init__(self, llm, tools): self.llm = llm self.tools = tools def solve(self, task: str) -> str: # Phase 1: Planning plan = self.create_plan(task)
Hybrid Architectures: Multi-Layer Intelligence
Combining the Best of All Worlds
Hybrid architectures combine multiple approaches in a layered system where different layers handle different types of reasoning and response.
Analogy: Think of a skilled emergency room doctor who operates on multiple levels:
- Reflexive layer: Immediate life-saving responses (check airways, stop bleeding)
- Diagnostic layer: Systematic analysis and planning (run tests, analyze symptoms)
- Strategic layer: Long-term treatment planning (recovery plan, follow-up care)
Multi-Layer Architecture
Interactive Architecture Explorer
Agent Architecture Patterns
Different approaches to organizing agent intelligence
Reactive Agents
- • Simple condition-action rules
- • Fast response times
- • No internal state
- • Example: Thermostat, Alarm system
Deliberative Agents
- • Plan before acting
- • Complex reasoning
- • Internal world model
- • Example: Chess AI, Route planner
ReAct Agents
- • Interleaved reasoning and acting
- • Adaptive problem solving
- • Tool integration
- • Example: LLM-powered assistants
Hybrid Agents
- • Multiple reasoning layers
- • Best of all approaches
- • Complex coordination
- • Example: Autonomous vehicles
Hybrid Architecture Implementation
python# Hybrid Agent Architecture class HybridAgent: def __init__(self, llm, tools): self.llm = llm self.tools = tools self.memory = {} # Layer configurations self.reactive_threshold = 0.1 # seconds self.tactical_threshold = 5.0 # seconds
Advanced Reasoning Patterns
Tree of Thoughts
Tree of Thoughts extends chain-of-thought reasoning by exploring multiple reasoning paths simultaneously, like a chess player considering multiple moves ahead.
Self-Correction and Reflection
Choosing the Right Architecture
Architecture Selection Guide
Performance Comparison
Architecture | Speed | Quality | Adaptability | Complexity | Best For |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reactive | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐ | ⭐ | Simple, fast responses |
ReAct | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | General problem solving |
Plan-Execute | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Complex, structured tasks |
Hybrid | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Variable, production systems |
Summary and Next Steps
Key Architecture Principles
- Match Pattern to Problem: Reactive for speed, Plan-Execute for complexity, ReAct for adaptability
- Layer When Needed: Hybrid architectures handle diverse requirements
- Enable Self-Correction: All patterns benefit from reflection and revision
- Consider Trade-offs: Speed vs. quality vs. adaptability
Architecture Evolution Path
In our next lesson, we'll explore tool integration—the mechanisms that allow agents to extend their capabilities through external APIs, databases, and services. This is where agents truly become powerful by leveraging the vast ecosystem of available tools and services.
Practice Exercises
- Pattern Implementation: Implement each architecture pattern with a simple example
- Performance Testing: Compare response times and quality across patterns
- Hybrid Design: Design a hybrid system for a specific use case
- Self-Evaluation: Add reflection capabilities to any architecture